Trump Campaign Utterly SMASHES Fundraising Record After Conviction

Adrian Norman – SCNR – May 31st

“[The] conviction of former President Donald Trump was a watershed moment in U.S. history.

It was also an event that has potentially awakened a sleeping giant and mobilized an untold number of Americans in support of Trump, as evidenced by a record-breaking fundraising haul taken in the hours after the verdict […].

Following the verdict, the Trump campaign brought in a “record shattering” small donor tally of $34.8 million, according to a statement emailed by campaign senior advisors Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles, who say the figure nearly doubles its single-day fundraising record.

Within minutes of the verdict being announced, the digital fundraising system WinRed crashed after being flooded with an overwhelming amount of traffic.

“Not only was the amount historic, but 29.7% of [the] donors were brand new donors to the WinRed platform,” the campaign said.

[…]

“President Trump and our campaign are immensely grateful [for] this outpouring of support from patriots across our country,” the campaign said in its statement. “President Trump is fighting to save our nation and Nov. 5th is the day Americans will deliver the REAL verdict.”

On the day of the verdict, a new Emerson College Polling/The Hill/PIX11 survey of NY voters was released showing Joe Biden with [only] a 7-point lead over Trump.

In 2020, Biden carried New York by a margin of 60.9% to 37.7%.

“Independent voters in New York who traditionally vote [Democrat], according to exit polling, have flipped to lean toward Trump by a margin of TEN points, 43% to 33%,” said Spencer Kimball, exec. director of Emerson College Polling.”

The truth matters – if you agree please consider subscribing (FREE). Am also on Minds, Gettr, Twitter, Gab, MeWe, Bitchute, Rumble, Odysee, and Clouthub. Any folks generous enough to support the flow of info can donate here. ✌🐸

Supreme Court CLEARS Path For NRA To Pursue 1a Case Against Former New York Official

Adrian Norman – SCNR – May 30th

“The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the National Rifle Association (NRA), saying it can pursue a lawsuit against a New York state official who pressured companies to stop doing business with it after the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

According to a February legal filing petitioning the nation’s highest court, the NRA states that Maria Vullo, the former superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, violated the First Amendment by pressuring banks and insurance companies to stop doing business with the [org].

In a unanimous 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court vacated a lower court ruling that dismissed the NRA’s 2018 lawsuit against Vullo.

In the suit, the 2nd amendment rights group said she retaliated […] after the Parkland shooting.

The NRA says Vullo used “pressure tactics—including backchannel threats, ominous guidance letters, and selective enforcement of regulatory infractions—to induce banks and insurance companies to avoid doing business with” [them].

Justice Sotomayor, writing for the Court, said today’s decision affirms that “government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors.”

She added that the NRA has plausibly alleged Vullo violated the First Amendment by coercing […] companies into dissociating with the group in order to punish or suppress firearm advocacy.

The pressure campaign by New York’s Department of Financial Services was not a behind-the-scenes matter. At least two publicly-available letters show Vullo directing banks and insurance companies to lean on the “NRA or similar gun promotion organizations” and take retaliatory action aimed at hurting the groups’ business operations.

Her letter to financial institutions cites “public health and safety” and “corporate social responsibility” as reasons for unconstitutional intervention, stating further her department “encourages its chartered and licensed financial institutions to continue evaluating and managing their risks, including reputational risks, that may arise from their dealings with the NRA or similar gun promotion [orgs].”

Similar language was used in a letter to insurers, telling them her department “encourages regulated institutions to review any relationships they have with the NRA or similar gun promotion organizations, and to take prompt actions to manage these risks and promote public health and safety.

Vullo later fined three insurers more than $13 million for offering an NRA-backed product called “Carry Guard,” which provided liability coverage and legal assistance for individuals who carry firearms.

Vullo has referred to the policy as ‘murder insurance’.”

The truth matters – if you agree please consider subscribing (FREE). Am also on Minds, Gettr, Twitter, Gab, MeWe, Bitchute, Rumble, Odysee, and Clouthub. Any folks generous enough to support the flow of info can donate here. ✌🐸