Democrats Circumvent THEIR OWN Rules To Nominate Joe Biden Virtually For Ohio Ballot Deadline

National PulseMay 29th

“The Democrat National Committee (DNC) plans to hold a “virtual roll call” to nominate Joe Biden before the […] convention, aiming to secure his place on Ohio’s general election ballot. […]

The Democrat convention, traditionally where candidates for president and vice president are nominated, is scheduled after Ohio’s Aug. 7 deadline for certifying candidates. 

Ohio GOP lawmakers, holding supermajorities in both the House and Senate, have been hesitant to pass a bill relaxing this deadline for Biden without introducing unrelated campaign finance legislation, which Democrats have labeled a “poison pill.”

The DNC’s rules and bylaws committee is expected to vote on June 4 to allow the virtual roll call. Following this, DNC members will vote on the resolution, enabling a virtual nomination process.

Officials have compared this approach to the virtual convention conducted in 2020 due to [covid].

[…]

Nickie Antonio, the Democrat leader in the Ohio Senate, announced the change in strategy, reassuring Democrats that Biden will be on the ballot regardless of state legislative actions. Reports that the timing of the Democratic convention may have prevented Biden from getting on the OH ballot first surfaced in April.”

The truth matters – if you agree please consider subscribing (FREE). Am also on Minds, Gettr, Twitter, Gab, MeWe, Bitchute, Rumble, Odysee, and Clouthub. Any folks generous enough to support the flow of info can donate here. ✌🐸

CNN Legal Analyst Laments The WEAK Case Against Trump

Ed KozakNational PulseMay 28th

“Defense attorney Randy Zelin voiced his belief that the prosecution in former President Donald Trump’s hush money case failed to meet its evidentiary burden during a segment on CNN Tuesday morning.

The network’s Kate Bolduan interviewed Zelin ahead of closing arguments in the case.

“The burden of proof is an important one to remind everyone: It’s on the prosecution, right? They need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he commit[ed] — that Donald Trump broke the law. And you think after listening to all of this, you think they fell short. How?” Bolduan asked Zelin.

“They fell way short, […] let’s start with reasonable doubt,” the legal analyst replied. “[…] Any time a human being needs to make an important decision in life, if you have enough info, for example, doctor says you need open heart surgery. ‘Doc, go ahead […]. I don’t have a reasonable doubt.’ […] if I say ‘I appreciate it, but I need a second opinion, I need more info,’ that is having a reasonable doubt. There is reasonable doubt all over this case.”

Zelin […] questioned the absence of key figures […] Keith Schiller and Allen Weisselberg in the proceedings. He also raised skepticism about the credibility of Michael Cohen, noting that Cohen had financial and personal motivations.

“Where is Keith Schiller? Where is Allen Weisselberg? How did Michael Cohen get away with stealing $30,000? Hold a pity party for him — made $4 million on this, thought he’d be chief of staff. He’s a fixer! If the plumber comes to my house to fix my leak, I could be home. That doesn’t mean I know how he’s doing it and what it’s taking to be fixed,” Zelin said.”

The truth matters – if you agree please consider subscribing (FREE). Am also on Minds, Gettr, Twitter, Gab, MeWe, Bitchute, Rumble, Odysee, and Clouthub. Any folks generous enough to support the flow of info can donate here. ✌🐸