Turley – MASSIVE WIN For Kari Lake!

Steve Turley covers the recent court ruling on Kari Lake’s lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of AZ’s 2022 election, March 23rd…

…via Gateway Pundit, March 24th:

“Kari Lake reportedly ‘lost’ to Democrat Katie Hobbs by 17,000 votes in last year’s AZ gubernatorial election, despite a double-digit lead in the polls.

Hobbs, AZ’s Soros-funded Secretary of State, oversaw her own election […], and the RINO Maricopa County election officials were rabidly anti-Kari Lake.

As previously reported, Lake’s lawsuit challenging the fraudulent results went to trial in the Maricopa County Superior Court on the issues of missing ballot chain of custody and Election Day machine failures. The count regarding fraudulent mail-in ballots and failed signature verifications were tossed and were not considered in the trial.

[…]

Kari Lake released a statement on Wednesday in response to the Supreme Court’s decision, saying, “Three whistleblowers came forward with revelations of massive failures in the signature verification process.” She continued, “These whistleblowers were intimately involved in the process and they allege that Maricopa County WILLFULLY ignored law and procedure.”

Despite this good news, the Supreme Court still dismissed the counts regarding Maricopa County lacking chain of custody documentation for hundreds of thousands of ballots and programmed machine failures at 59% of voting locations on Election Day when voters turned out 3:1 for Kari Lake.

The election should be tossed out on the failed voting machines issue alone. Chain of Custody documentation is also required by law. How can the courts consider this a fair election?

Judge Thompson gave all parties until Tuesday, March 28, to file a memorandum of law “as a supplement to the previously filed Motions To Dismiss, Response and Reply.”

According to US Legal, “A ‘memorandum of law’ may be prepared by an attorney to support a legal argument, which is similar to a brief but with less attention to legal writing formalities. It contains legal arguments based upon the lawyer’s understanding of the law applicable to the issues and is often supported by citations to legal authority.”

He further ordered the parties to appear for oral argument on Thursday, March 30, at 9:00 am if he decides not to dismiss the lawsuit again.”

However, a few days later the order regarding deadlines was rescinded.

…via Jordan Conradson at GP, March 27th:

“The deadline to submit memorandums of law was set for Tuesday, March 28, and possible conference with oral argument was set for Thursday, March 30.

Lake’s team filed a Motion to Clarify on Friday in the Supreme Court, extending the due date to file a response to sanctions requested by Maricopa County. The Supreme Court then issued a new order setting April 5 as the deadline for Response and April 12 […] for the Defendants’ replies.”

The truth matters – if you agree, please consider subscribing (FREE). Am also on Minds, Gettr, Twitter, Gab, MeWe, Bitchute, Rumble, Odysee, and Clouthub. Any folks generous enough to support the flow of info can donate here. ✌🐸